Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(azure): use correct ip for APIM in prod #1036

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 21, 2024

Conversation

arealmaas
Copy link
Collaborator

@arealmaas arealmaas commented Aug 21, 2024

Description

Adding the IP for the APIM in production as IP-restriction for the apps.

Related Issue(s)

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Documentation

  • Documentation is updated (either in docs-directory, Altinnpedia or a separate linked PR in altinn-studio-docs., if applicable)

Copy link

@arealmaas arealmaas merged commit fecc4c0 into main Aug 21, 2024
20 checks passed
@arealmaas arealmaas deleted the fix/add-correct-apim-ip-in-prod branch August 21, 2024 11:56
arealmaas pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2024
🤖 I have created a release *beep* *boop*
---


##
[1.15.0](v1.14.0...v1.15.0)
(2024-08-21)


### Features

* add support for serviceowner admin scope
([#1002](#1002))
([2638b48](2638b48))
* **web-api:** Add optional EndUserId param to ServiceOwner Get Dialog
details API
([#1020](#1020))
([1380b33](1380b33))


### Bug Fixes

* **azure:** use correct ip for APIM in prod
([#1036](#1036))
([fecc4c0](fecc4c0))

---
This PR was generated with [Release
Please](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please). See
[documentation](https://github.com/googleapis/release-please#release-please).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants