Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Fix BaseUri on localhost trailing slash discrepancy on OAuth metadata #1145

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 17, 2024

Conversation

elsand
Copy link
Collaborator

@elsand elsand commented Sep 17, 2024

Description

This is the same issue as fixed for the iss claim in #1047 (trailing slash behaviour differs when BaseUri is localhost). Root cause not yet determined, but this functions as a workaround.

Related Issue(s)

  • N/A

Verification

  • Your code builds clean without any errors or warnings
  • Manual testing done (required)
  • Relevant automated test added (if you find this hard, leave it and we'll help out)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Improved the construction of the Issuer and JwksUri properties for better readability and maintainability.

@elsand elsand requested a review from a team as a code owner September 17, 2024 12:11
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 17, 2024

Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the GetOauthAuthorizationServerQueryHandler class, specifically in the Handle method. The construction of the Issuer and JwksUri properties has been refactored to improve code clarity. A new variable, issuerUrl, consolidates the base URI and API version, ensuring consistent formatting by removing the trailing slash. Additionally, the JwksUri is now created using string interpolation instead of concatenation.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/WellKnown/OauthAuthorizationServer/Queries/Get/GetOauthAuthorizationServerQuery.cs Refactored Issuer and JwksUri construction in Handle method for improved readability and maintainability. Introduced issuerUrl for consistent URI formatting and used string interpolation for JwksUri.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    -- I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    -- Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    -- @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    -- @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    -- @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    -- @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    -- @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.
Early access features: enabled

We are currently testing the following features in early access:

  • OpenAI o1 for code reviews: OpenAI's new o1 model is being tested for generating code suggestions in code reviews.

Note:

  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Copy link

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: ASSERTIVE

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between ca74667 and 4ac6b02.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/Digdir.Domain.Dialogporten.Application/Features/V1/WellKnown/OauthAuthorizationServer/Queries/Get/GetOauthAuthorizationServerQuery.cs (1 hunks)

@elsand elsand merged commit 09ce878 into main Sep 17, 2024
22 checks passed
@elsand elsand deleted the fix/baseuri-on-localhost-discrepancy branch September 17, 2024 13:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Archived in project
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants