Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Plan for Btrfs? #1

Open
mickours opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 1 comment
Open

Plan for Btrfs? #1

mickours opened this issue Sep 14, 2015 · 1 comment

Comments

@mickours
Copy link

Hi,
Is there a plan to support Btrfs in the future? Is it even possible to do it without Aufs?

Thanks!

@djosephsen
Copy link
Owner

I'd have to look into how docker uses btrfs.. it's probably possible. Honestly the "right answer" here is probably for me to dig into the actual docker codebase and figure out what it would take to PR them something like a docker isolate command. When I wrote this hack I wasn't sure if small containers was a thing other people actually cared about, but at this point I think I'm convinced it is. I'll dig into it when I get some time, and see how they react to the idea. They may not be depending on their roadmap etc.. at which point I guess I'll fall back to properly maintaining skinnywhale until they make it irrelevant.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants