-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Status on std.data.json for Phobos #24
Comments
This is mainly blocked by:
|
How about using Fibers and yield? This would make it easy to store the stack. If needed you can plug a small buffer around it.
Do you know about this? https://github.com/burner/std.rcstring
Is this really blocking this proposal - it feels like if rcstring comes to Phobos, we still can add built-in support?
What exactly do you mean by this? |
That would be too slow. The general impression from the reviews was that we need to have the fastest implementation in the world...
Yes, although I've never used it. I guess it isn't usable together with
At least Andrei feels pretty strongly about this, but also depending on how the final RC design will be, it could mean some deep changes are required to add support, which may be difficult to do with a proper deprecation path.
Mainly lexing of string and number tokens. If they are not used, they can possibly be skipped faster and more importantly without using any memory allocations. |
How's it going with this? We are currently noticing a need for a fast (well, or not incredibly slow like |
Phobos is in a feature freeze, so don't expect ANYTHING being added there. Why can't you use this module? |
I mean, I'm gonna. I'm just saying it's a bit sad that I can't use it in phobos rather than in dub. PS: Apropos, hi! Dub review pls! |
On Thursday, 5 February 2015 at 17:26:34 UTC, Sönke Ludwig wrote:
Any news on your progress to get this into Phobos?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: