Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Advice on choosing UMI_min_sigma for probe-based methods #197

Open
dpcook opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 0 comments
Open

Advice on choosing UMI_min_sigma for probe-based methods #197

dpcook opened this issue Mar 25, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@dpcook
Copy link

dpcook commented Mar 25, 2024

Hi there,

I've found that RCTD works nicely for reference-based cell annotation for imaging-based spatial data (with the added benefit of providing some insight into segmentation error).

I was wondering if you had any suggestions for a heuristic to set UMI_min_sigma. Is this effectively just a lower threshold for cell quality? So with these in situ methods where median transcript counts is ~100, something like 25 or 50 may be appropriate?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant