You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I've found that RCTD works nicely for reference-based cell annotation for imaging-based spatial data (with the added benefit of providing some insight into segmentation error).
I was wondering if you had any suggestions for a heuristic to set UMI_min_sigma. Is this effectively just a lower threshold for cell quality? So with these in situ methods where median transcript counts is ~100, something like 25 or 50 may be appropriate?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi there,
I've found that RCTD works nicely for reference-based cell annotation for imaging-based spatial data (with the added benefit of providing some insight into segmentation error).
I was wondering if you had any suggestions for a heuristic to set
UMI_min_sigma
. Is this effectively just a lower threshold for cell quality? So with these in situ methods where median transcript counts is ~100, something like 25 or 50 may be appropriate?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: