Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add service virtual IP to sandbox's loopback address #1877

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 9, 2017

Conversation

fcrisciani
Copy link

Refreshed the PR: #1585
Addressed comments suggesting to remove the IPAlias logic not anymore used

Signed-off-by: Flavio Crisciani flavio.crisciani@docker.com

@sanimej
Copy link

sanimej commented Aug 2, 2017

Change LGTM.

This will change the VIP assignment behavior that we have had since 1.12.x and can impact apps that make assumptions about the alias IP. Generally such assumptions are bad practices and its unlikely there are many such apps. So this looks ok to me. @mavenugo wdyt ?

@fcrisciani
Copy link
Author

@mavenugo PTAL

if len(ep.virtualIP) != 0 {
vipAlias := &net.IPNet{IP: ep.virtualIP, Mask: net.CIDRMask(32, 32)}
ifaceOptions = append(ifaceOptions, sb.osSbox.InterfaceOptions().IPAliases([]*net.IPNet{vipAlias}))
}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@fcrisciani am yet to go over the details of this. But it seems like we are missing calling the method to add the vip to the loopback interface ?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yep looks like it

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

With the loopback interface replacing the endpoint interface to host the virtual-ip, there is no need for restoreOslSandbox to restore the states, since there is no state to be restored in OSL Sandbox :-)
The change is good to go as is.

@fcrisciani
Copy link
Author

Updated the commit but I would like to discuss the case here with you @mavenugo before the merge

Refreshed the PR: moby#1585
Addressed comments suggesting to remove the IPAlias logic not anymore used

Signed-off-by: Flavio Crisciani <flavio.crisciani@docker.com>
@mavenugo mavenugo merged commit 24bb72a into moby:master Aug 9, 2017
@fcrisciani fcrisciani deleted the viplo branch August 14, 2017 15:22
jasontedor added a commit to jasontedor/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Dec 30, 2017
Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).
jasontedor added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2018
* Only bind loopback addresses when binding to local

Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).

Relates #28029
jasontedor added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2018
* Only bind loopback addresses when binding to local

Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).

Relates #28029
jasontedor added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2018
* Only bind loopback addresses when binding to local

Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).

Relates #28029
jasontedor added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2018
* Only bind loopback addresses when binding to local

Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).

Relates #28029
jasontedor added a commit to elastic/elasticsearch that referenced this pull request Jan 2, 2018
* Only bind loopback addresses when binding to local

Today when binding to local (the default) we bind to any address that is
a loopback address, or any address on an interface that declares itself
as a loopback interface. Yet, not all addresses on loopback interfaces
are loopback addresses. This arises on macOS where there is a link-local
address assigned to the loopback interface (fe80::1%lo0) and in Docker
services where virtual IPs of the service are assigned to the loopback
interface (moby/libnetwork#1877). These situations cause problems:
 - because we do not handle the scope ID of a link-local address, we end
   up bound to an address for which publishing of that address does not
   allow that address to be reached (since we drop the scope)
 - the virtual IPs in the Docker situation are not loopback addresses,
   they are not link-local addresses, so we end up bound to interfaces
   that cause the bootstrap checks to be enforced even though the
   instance is only bound to local

We address this by only binding to actual loopback addresses, and skip
binding to any address on a loopback interface that is not a loopback
address. This lets us simplify some code where in the bootstrap checks
we were skipping link-local addresses, and in writing the ports file
where we had to skip link-local addresses because again the formatting
of them does not allow them to be connected to by another node (to be
clear, they could be connected to via the scope-qualified address, but
that information is not written out).

Relates #28029
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants