Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Export bare tag names #212

Closed
penguineer opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #358
Closed

Export bare tag names #212

penguineer opened this issue Jun 3, 2022 · 6 comments · Fixed by #358

Comments

@penguineer
Copy link

For integration with other tools (such as JIB) I would like access to the bare tag names (without the image name prepended), so that I can use this action even when the image name is created by another tool and complete image names cannot be specified.

@ScottGuymer
Copy link

This option would also enable to use other actions such as https://github.com/mr-smithers-excellent/docker-build-push/

Which are needed if you want to use windows, as the docker action does not support windows containers docker/build-push-action#18

@vanicekv
Copy link

Exactly as written, it would allow using other actions for Windows for example. Support with the package https://github.com/mr-smithers-excellent/docker-build-push/ would be more than helpful.

@hotrungnhan
Copy link

+1

@jasondamour
Copy link
Contributor

jasondamour commented Jul 1, 2023

Another use case would be if you are building multiple docker images in the same pipeline, you can resuse the tags metadata for all of them.

@crazy-max Can you give any insight as to what the inputs.image.enabled variable is supposed to do? Seems to do nothing

@irux
Copy link

irux commented Oct 9, 2023

@jasondamour @crazy-max any updates on this ?

@penguineer
Copy link
Author

Thank you for resolving this issue!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

7 participants