Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eXoWin9x emulation requirements #2185

Closed
Torinde opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

eXoWin9x emulation requirements #2185

Torinde opened this issue Jan 2, 2023 · 2 comments
Labels
out of scope Issue conflicts with projects goals. Has a tendency turn into "won't do" at the speed of light! 😎 ⚡

Comments

@Torinde
Copy link
Contributor

Torinde commented Jan 2, 2023

in addition to save/restore memory and CPU state - what about snapshot capabilities like Virtualbox, e.g. for the HDD/CD images, configuration changes, etc.? To have a "ROM-like" frozen state (snapshot) and subsequent storage changes to be recorded in a subsequent-state-file(s). User to be able to "merge" or not those back into the ROM frozen state (or in a copy of that).
A better description is at the emulator requirements for eXoWin9x.

Originally posted by @Torinde in #313 (comment)

Related to https://github.com/dosbox-staging/dosbox-staging/projects/7#column-10278621

From the interview:

  • master Win98 install, with each game installing to its own child image. This would allow any changes to the OS folders (or the C: at all) to be captured by the child\diff image.
  • dynamic images. report to the OS that there is plenty of free space available without having to make a custom image for every single game that has exactly the amount of space we need for the installed product.
  • emulator that has the horsepower needed.

My comments on the horsepower:

@kcgen
Copy link
Member

kcgen commented Jan 2, 2023

Thanks @Torinde.

Windows 9x (and related era hardware) is out of scope - see: https://dosbox-staging.github.io/about/

@Torinde
Copy link
Contributor Author

Torinde commented Jan 2, 2023

Oh, sorry. I got carried away by seeing that you track explicitly in a project the "eXoDOS features" and I remembered that interview where Win9x was mentioned as needing more from emulators than what's available already.

@Torinde Torinde closed this as completed Jan 2, 2023
@Torinde Torinde closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Jan 2, 2023
@Torinde Torinde mentioned this issue Jan 10, 2023
2 tasks
@johnnovak johnnovak added the out of scope Issue conflicts with projects goals. Has a tendency turn into "won't do" at the speed of light! 😎 ⚡ label Aug 4, 2023
@Torinde Torinde mentioned this issue Jan 7, 2024
16 tasks
@Torinde Torinde mentioned this issue Feb 25, 2024
10 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
out of scope Issue conflicts with projects goals. Has a tendency turn into "won't do" at the speed of light! 😎 ⚡
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants