-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add spec details based on test plan review feedback #8169
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jcouv
approved these changes
May 30, 2024
jjonescz
reviewed
May 31, 2024
RikkiGibson
commented
May 31, 2024
RikkiGibson
commented
May 31, 2024
- Attribute lists on or within partial property declarations do not need to match. Instead, merging of attributes in corresponding positions is performed, per [Attribute merging](#attribute-merging). | ||
- Nullable context differences do not cause warnings. In other words, a difference where one of the types is nullable-oblivious and the other type is either nullable-annotated or not-nullable-annotated does not result in any warnings. | ||
- Default parameter values do not need to match. A warning is reported when the implementation part of a partial indexer has default parameter values. This is similar to an existing warning which occurs when the implementation part of a partial method has default parameter values. | ||
5. A warning occurs when parameter names differ across defining and implementing declarations. The parameter names from the definition part are used at use sites and in emit. | ||
6. Nullability differences which do not involve oblivious nullability result in warnings. When analyzing an accessor body, the implementation part signature is used. The definition part signature is used when analyzing use sites and in emit. This is consistent with partial methods. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
updated this language per @cston feedback
jcouv
approved these changes
May 31, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM Thanks (iteration 3)
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
dotnet/roslyn#73090
Not attempting to change any of the weirdness detailed in here prior to feature merge. And, if any breaking changes are accepted in order to make things less weird here, we'll do them for both methods and properties.