Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support immutable collections in the model #190

Closed
rowanmiller opened this issue May 22, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

Support immutable collections in the model #190

rowanmiller opened this issue May 22, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
closed-out-of-scope This is not something that will be fixed/implemented and the issue is closed. type-enhancement

Comments

@rowanmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Originally requested on CodePlex - https://entityframework.codeplex.com/workitem/2281

@rowanmiller rowanmiller modified the milestones: Backlog, 1.0.0 May 22, 2014
@divega divega changed the title Consider supporting immutabel collections in the model Consider supporting immutable collections in the model Sep 22, 2014
@rowanmiller rowanmiller modified the milestones: Backlog, 7.0.0 Nov 26, 2014
@rowanmiller rowanmiller changed the title Consider supporting immutable collections in the model Support immutable collections in the model Nov 26, 2014
@ajcvickers
Copy link
Contributor

Closing this in favor of general support for any type of collection, as tracked by #752

@ajcvickers ajcvickers removed this from the Backlog milestone Feb 17, 2018
@ajcvickers ajcvickers added the closed-out-of-scope This is not something that will be fixed/implemented and the issue is closed. label Mar 10, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers reopened this Oct 16, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
closed-out-of-scope This is not something that will be fixed/implemented and the issue is closed. type-enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants