Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support materialization hook #3943

Closed
natemcmaster opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 4 comments
Closed

Support materialization hook #3943

natemcmaster opened this issue Dec 2, 2015 · 4 comments

Comments

@natemcmaster
Copy link
Contributor

Add a hook for customizing the ValueBuffer => ClrType materialization step.

Just one usage scenario among many possibilities:
Materializing an Annotatable. I want to put shadow properties into annotations.

@rowanmiller
Copy link
Contributor

Think this is a dupe of #240

@rowanmiller
Copy link
Contributor

BTW I think you don't actually want shadow properties right... you want a property that is stored in the CLR type but to get/set the value you don't use a property getter/setter.

@natemcmaster
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes can be solved by #240. This could also be solved by #2968. I was aware of these issues when filing, but still think a materialization extension point could be useful.

@natemcmaster
Copy link
Contributor Author

#2968 (comment)

@ajcvickers ajcvickers reopened this Oct 16, 2022
@ajcvickers ajcvickers closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Oct 16, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants