Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

GenerateProperty/Field: consider adjusting behavior for positional records #44557

Closed
jcouv opened this issue May 26, 2020 · 1 comment
Closed
Labels
Area-IDE Feature Request Need Design Review The end user experience design needs to be reviewed and approved. New Language Feature - Records Records Resolution-By Design The behavior reported in the issue matches the current design
Milestone

Comments

@jcouv
Copy link
Member

jcouv commented May 26, 2020

Before:
image

After:
image

Should we offer an option to generate a positional member?

Relates to #40726 (test plan for "records")

@jcouv jcouv added Area-IDE Feature Request New Language Feature - Records Records Need Design Review The end user experience design needs to be reviewed and approved. labels May 26, 2020
@jinujoseph jinujoseph added this to the Backlog milestone Jun 4, 2020
@jcouv jcouv modified the milestones: Backlog, 16.9 Sep 2, 2020
@jinujoseph jinujoseph modified the milestones: 16.9, Backlog Jan 17, 2021
@CyrusNajmabadi
Copy link
Member

This behavior is fine, and we haven't heard from any users about wanting things to be different. So we'll keep this as is.

@CyrusNajmabadi CyrusNajmabadi closed this as not planned Won't fix, can't repro, duplicate, stale Mar 2, 2023
@CyrusNajmabadi CyrusNajmabadi added the Resolution-By Design The behavior reported in the issue matches the current design label Mar 2, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area-IDE Feature Request Need Design Review The end user experience design needs to be reviewed and approved. New Language Feature - Records Records Resolution-By Design The behavior reported in the issue matches the current design
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants