Sharing violation reading pgd file during concurrent local coreclr builds (windows x86 release)

[trylek]

Initial cost estimate: 2 days
Initial contacts: @trylek, @jkoritzinsky, @davidwrighton

OS: Windows
Architecture: x86
Configuration: Release
Repro steps (non-deterministic): build clr+libs+libs.tests -a x86 -c Release in two runtime repo clones

    D:\git\runtime\artifacts\obj\coreclr\windows.x86.Release\vm\wks\cee_wks_obj.dir\Release\ceemain.obj
  LINK : fatal error LNK1266: error reading instrumentation file 'C:\Users\trylek\.nuget\packages\optimization.windows_nt-x86.pgo.coreclr\99.99.99-master-20200806.6\data\coreclr.pgd'; Sharing violation [D:\git\runtime\artifacts\obj\coreclr\windows.x86.Release\dlls\mscoree\coreclr\coreclr.vcxproj]
    Finished generating code
    mscordaccore.vcxproj -> D:\git\runtime\artifacts\obj\coreclr\windows.x86.Release\dlls\mscordac\Release\mscordaccore.dll

  Build FAILED.

  LINK : fatal error LNK1266: error reading instrumentation file 'C:\Users\trylek\.nuget\packages\optimization.windows_nt-x86.pgo.coreclr\99.99.99-master-20200806.6\data\coreclr.pgd'; Sharing violation [D:\git\runtime\artifacts\obj\coreclr\windows.x86.Release\dlls\mscoree\coreclr\coreclr.vcxproj]
      0 Warning(s)
      1 Error(s)

Likely the linker opens the PGD file without the sharing flag so that multiple parallel coreclr builds step on each other's toes. This is happening pretty frequently and degrades local developer inner loop experience. While it seems clearly a linker bug (there's no reason for it to request exclusive / write access to the pgd file), it remains to be seen whether asking for a linker fix would be actionable so we may want to consider a workaround like copying the file to a repo location prior to linking even though it's somewhat unfortunate as the file has 36 MB so that it will probably incur a few seconds' perf penalty.

/cc @dotnet/runtime-infrastructure

[ViktorHofer]

cc @akoeplinger and @marek-safar regarding the linker ask.

[akoeplinger]

@ViktorHofer this is about the native C++ linker, not the managed linker :)

[ViktorHofer]

Haha 😂 thanks for clarifying