-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Perf] Changes at 4/3/2022 6:13:34 PM #68433
Comments
Dup of #68410 |
I couldn't figure out the best area label to add to this issue. If you have write-permissions please help me learn by adding exactly one area label. |
As per @SingleAccretion in #68410 (comment) The regressions could be related to #67335. |
1) That same bump if we look at the broader history: This looks like modal behavior to me (notably, the lower mode stayed the same at about I was also not able to reproduce the regression locally, even though there was an assembly diff: So I think it is safe to say that this regression is not caused by #67335. 2) It also looks like modal behavior: The benchmark is once again calling ChkCastAny, which does not have any Finally, I was not able to reproduce the regression locally, so I do not think #65803 is to blame. 3) Looking at the history, we once again see modal behavior: And I was not able to reproduce the regression locally - presuming #67335 is not the cause for this one too. 4) However, since then, the benchmark has returned to the before-regressions state: As with the other benchmarks, I was not able to reproduce the regression locally, and so do not think #67335 and #65803 are to blame. |
Tagging subscribers to this area: @JulieLeeMSFT Issue DetailsRun Information
Regressions in PerfLabTests.CastingPerf2.CastingPerf
Reprogit clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net6.0 --filter 'PerfLabTests.CastingPerf2.CastingPerf*' PayloadsHistogramPerfLabTests.CastingPerf2.CastingPerf.IFooObjIsIFoo
Description of detection logic
Description of detection logic
DocsProfiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Regressions in System.Collections.IndexerSet<Int32>
Reprogit clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net6.0 --filter 'System.Collections.IndexerSet<Int32>*' PayloadsHistogramSystem.Collections.IndexerSet<Int32>.ConcurrentDictionary(Size: 512)
Description of detection logic
DocsProfiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository Run Information
Regressions in System.Collections.ContainsKeyFalse<String, String>
Reprogit clone https://github.com/dotnet/performance.git
py .\performance\scripts\benchmarks_ci.py -f net6.0 --filter 'System.Collections.ContainsKeyFalse<String, String>*' PayloadsHistogramSystem.Collections.ContainsKeyFalse<String, String>.IDictionary(Size: 512)
Description of detection logic
DocsProfiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
|
Run Information
Regressions in PerfLabTests.CastingPerf2.CastingPerf
Test Report
Repro
Payloads
Baseline
Compare
Histogram
PerfLabTests.CastingPerf2.CastingPerf.IFooObjIsIFoo
Description of detection logic
Description of detection logic
Docs
Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Regressions in System.Collections.IndexerSet<Int32>
Test Report
Repro
Payloads
Baseline
Compare
Histogram
System.Collections.IndexerSet<Int32>.ConcurrentDictionary(Size: 512)
Description of detection logic
Docs
Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Run Information
Regressions in System.Collections.ContainsKeyFalse<String, String>
Test Report
Repro
Payloads
Baseline
Compare
Histogram
System.Collections.ContainsKeyFalse<String, String>.IDictionary(Size: 512)
Description of detection logic
Docs
Profiling workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
Benchmarking workflow for dotnet/runtime repository
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: