Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different CpG calls when using different regions of inclusion for Methyldackel extract #157

Open
MoniDR opened this issue Apr 3, 2024 · 0 comments

Comments

@MoniDR
Copy link

MoniDR commented Apr 3, 2024

Hi,

We've been using methyldackel for the analysis of our EM-seq libraries and I've noticed a bit of an odd behaviour from methyldackel. Specifically, when I specify different regions of inclusion (i.e. bed file A and bed file B, where file B should be a subset of file A), methyldackel returns slightly different regions in the final bedGraph files. In some cases a CpG regions not present in the bedGraph generated with -l fileA seems to be present in the bedGraph generated with -l fileB. I'm using the following parameters:

varFrac = 0.5
OppDepth = 10
minCov = 10
OT = 6,140,6,140
OB = 5,143,5,143
-l fileA/fileB

(OT/OB boundaries have been empirically defined using Methyldackel mbias).

Any idea as to why this is?

Thank you so much in advance fr your help!
Monica

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant