Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

replace run_cmd with run_shell_cmd in custom easyblock for MXNet (mxnet.py) #3206

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 4, 2024

Conversation

branfosj
Copy link
Member

@branfosj branfosj commented Feb 10, 2024

(created using eb --new-pr)

  • no use of EB_MXNet in easyconfigs or blocks

@branfosj
Copy link
Member Author

branfosj commented Feb 10, 2024

Test report by @branfosj

Overview of tested easyconfigs (in order)

Build succeeded for 0 out of 1 (1 easyconfigs in total)
bear-pg0105u03b - Linux RHEL 8.6, x86_64, Intel(R) Xeon(R) Platinum 8360Y CPU @ 2.40GHz (icelake), Python 3.6.8
See https://gist.github.com/branfosj/e4ddddb61082504fad34eca6ecaa9e50 for a full test report.

edit

== FAILED: Installation ended unsuccessfully: `/rds/projects/2017/branfosj-rse/easybuild/EL8-ice/software/Python/3.10.4-GCCcore-11.3.0/bin/python -m pip check` failed:               
mxnet 1.9.1 has requirement graphviz<0.9.0,>=0.8.1, but you have graphviz 0.20.1.

Failure is not related to this PR and the easyconfig does not enable the installation of the R extension...

Copy link
Contributor

@bartoldeman bartoldeman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@boegel boegel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@boegel boegel merged commit bd8999d into easybuilders:5.0.x Mar 4, 2024
17 checks passed
@branfosj branfosj deleted the 20240210091418_new_pr_mxnet branch March 4, 2024 08:28
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
Status: No status
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants