Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

drop into shell with full environment in case of failure #3950

Closed
surak opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

drop into shell with full environment in case of failure #3950

surak opened this issue Jan 19, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
EasyBuild-5.0 EasyBuild 5.0 feature request
Milestone
5.0

Comments

@surak
Copy link

surak commented Jan 19, 2022

This is an issue regarding the discussion on 19.01.2022
@boegel boegel transferred this issue from easybuilders/easybuild Feb 2, 2022
@boegel boegel changed the title Drop into shell with full environment in case of failure drop into shell with full environment in case of failure Feb 2, 2022
@boegel boegel added this to the 5.0 milestone Jul 5, 2023
@boegel boegel added the EasyBuild-5.0 EasyBuild 5.0 label Jul 5, 2023
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jul 5, 2023

We're looking into implementing support for this in EasyBuild 5.0, along with the implementation of the new run function (see #4252).

@Micket mentioned he has looked into this a bit already, but it would be good to get #4284 merged first to start working on the actual implementation (which probably involves leveraging pty.spawn)

@boegel boegel mentioned this issue Jul 6, 2023
Closed
@boegel
Copy link
Member

boegel commented Jun 5, 2024

Starting an interactive shell for a failing shell command will be supported in EasyBuild 5.0, see #4486, so closing this...

@boegel boegel closed this as completed Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
EasyBuild-5.0 EasyBuild 5.0 feature request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
5.0
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@boegel @surak