Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support access via symbols #45

Closed
e0da opened this issue Dec 9, 2013 · 8 comments
Closed

Support access via symbols #45

e0da opened this issue Dec 9, 2013 · 8 comments

Comments

@e0da
Copy link

e0da commented Dec 9, 2013

You should be using a Mash or something that allows access via string index, symbol index, or dot notation. This is the behavior supported by search in Chef. I think the point of this is to work the same way, right?

Thanks!

@tobami
Copy link

tobami commented Dec 20, 2013

Yes, you are right. There are cookbooks that fail because they use dot notation in the templates for variables that come from search results, so we always have to modify them to use single quotes.

@michaelglass
Copy link

@justinforce PR and you shall receive. Keeping this open because it's required for feature parity. However, I think with Chef Zero, this repo is gonna end not being heavily maintained. Thoughts, @tobami ?

@michaelglass
Copy link

actually. closing this as I think I like #42 more as a solution to it if we get around to it.

@e0da
Copy link
Author

e0da commented Apr 26, 2014

I would love to PR, but I left my job and I don't see much DevOps in my future. So long, Chef! We had a good run. I'm very grateful for all the time and test coverage that chef-solo-search netted me. Thanks!

@tobami
Copy link

tobami commented Jun 20, 2014

@michaelglass sorry I missed your question. What Chef Zero will mean for this repo remain to be seen. I don't have any definitive thoughts yet. Are you planning to move to Chef Zero?

@michaelglass
Copy link

@tobami we've moved to Opsworks

@tobami
Copy link

tobami commented Jun 25, 2014

@michaelglass cool to know, thanks for sharing. Is it working well for you?

@michaelglass
Copy link

Amazon has great tools but there are a few annoying inconsistencies. alas & alck.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants