Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add contributors to readmes #148

Closed
dcwalk opened this issue Jun 5, 2017 · 6 comments
Closed

Add contributors to readmes #148

dcwalk opened this issue Jun 5, 2017 · 6 comments

Comments

@dcwalk
Copy link
Contributor

dcwalk commented Jun 5, 2017

Per @Mr0grog's wonderful lead in edgi-govdata-archiving/web-monitoring-db#75 (review), it would be great to add the stripped down all-contributors to our core active readmes...

@Frijol
Copy link
Contributor

Frijol commented Dec 19, 2018

Per our new stale issues policy:

This issue has been marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in seven days if no further activity occurs. If it should not be closed, please comment! Thank you for your contributions.

In the future, a robot will take care of this process!

@Frijol Frijol added the stale label Dec 19, 2018
@Frijol
Copy link
Contributor

Frijol commented Dec 19, 2018

Was thinking about this with @lightandluck today– I'm very pro- the philosophy of this, but I'm wondering if there is a simpler/more maintainable way to go about this. What do you think of linking to https://envirodatagov.org/about/members/ from readmes?

@Frijol Frijol removed the stale label Dec 19, 2018
@Mr0grog
Copy link
Member

Mr0grog commented Dec 19, 2018

Dunno about this repo, but for all the code repos, at least, project contribution and EDGI membership are very different groups. For example, this list is mostly non-EDGI people.

@lightandluck
Copy link
Contributor

Saw this over on IPFS and how they list contributors. Maybe we can use that and link to our members page for this overview repo?

@Mr0grog
Copy link
Member

Mr0grog commented Jan 15, 2019

Saw this over on IPFS and how they list contributors.

I am not a big fan of that because:

  • I think the score-keeping feeling of counting all the PR/issues/comments someone makes is not healthy.
  • I care a lot about the fact that we take pains to include contributions that do not happen in ways tracked by GitHub. A script like this explicitly takes the opposite approach.

@stale
Copy link

stale bot commented Sep 15, 2019

This issue has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had recent activity. It will be closed in seven days if no further activity occurs. If it should not be closed, please comment! Thank you for your contributions.

@stale stale bot added the stale label Sep 15, 2019
@stale stale bot closed this as completed Sep 22, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants