You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The trick we do for classes, containing the “layers” in the unece:cefactElementMetadata sections - could that be done for relationships too? Those two relationships are the same, aren’t they?
So, could
{
"@id": "unece:includedSupplyChainConsignmentItem",
"@type": "rdfs:Property",
"schema:rangeIncludes": "unece:ConsignmentItem",
"schema:domainIncludes": "unece:Consignment",
"rdfs:comment": "A consignment item included in this supply chain consignment.",
"unece:cefactElementMetadata": [
{
"@id": "cefact:SupplyChain_Consignment.Included.SupplyChain_ConsignmentItem",
"@type": "unece:AssociationBIE",
"unece:cefactUNId": "cefact:UN01004258",
"unece:cefactBieDomainClass": "cefact:SupplyChain_Consignment.Details",
"unece:cefactBusinessProcess": "Buy-Ship-Pay",
"rdfs:comment": "A consignment item included in this supply chain consignment."
}
]
},
and
{
"@id": "unece:includedReferencedSupplyChainConsignmentItem",
"@type": "rdfs:Property",
"schema:rangeIncludes": "unece:ConsignmentItem",
"schema:domainIncludes": "unece:Consignment",
"rdfs:comment": "A referenced consignment item included in this referenced supply chain consignment.",
"unece:cefactElementMetadata": [
{
"@id": "cefact:Referenced_SupplyChain_Consignment.Included.Referenced_SupplyChain_ConsignmentItem",
"@type": "unece:AssociationBIE",
"unece:cefactUNId": "cefact:UN01004048",
"unece:cefactBieDomainClass": "cefact:Referenced_SupplyChain_Consignment.Details",
"unece:cefactBusinessProcess": "Buy-Ship-Pay",
"rdfs:comment": "A referenced consignment item included in this referenced supply chain consignment."
}
]
},
be joined together into just unece:includedConsignmentItem? Which could then reference unece:includedSupplyChainConsignmentItem and unece:includedReferencedSupplyChainConsignmentItem within its unece:cefactElementMetadata?
In the Excel export, this would be the UN01004258 ASBIE Included Consignment Item A consignment item included in this supply chain consignment. 0 unbounded Supply Chain_ Consignment. Included. Supply Chain_ Consignment Item
and UN01004048 ASBIE Included Consignment Item A referenced consignment item included in this referenced supply chain consignment. 0 unbounded Referenced_ Supply Chain_ Consignment. Included. Referenced_ Supply Chain_ Consignment Item
Combined, named from the common Business Name (Included Consignment Item)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The trick we do for classes, containing the “layers” in the unece:cefactElementMetadata sections - could that be done for relationships too? Those two relationships are the same, aren’t they?
So, could
and
be joined together into just unece:includedConsignmentItem? Which could then reference unece:includedSupplyChainConsignmentItem and unece:includedReferencedSupplyChainConsignmentItem within its unece:cefactElementMetadata?
In the Excel export, this would be the
UN01004258 ASBIE Included Consignment Item A consignment item included in this supply chain consignment. 0 unbounded Supply Chain_ Consignment. Included. Supply Chain_ Consignment Item
and
UN01004048 ASBIE Included Consignment Item A referenced consignment item included in this referenced supply chain consignment. 0 unbounded Referenced_ Supply Chain_ Consignment. Included. Referenced_ Supply Chain_ Consignment Item
Combined, named from the common Business Name (
Included Consignment Item
)The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: