-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 69
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SEC-119 - Need to bring in classification schemes that are used by the SEC and other regulators for classifying shares #1982
Conversation
… Russell to securities classification Signed-off-by: Elisa Kendall <ekendall@thematix.com>
Signed-off-by: Elisa Kendall <ekendall@thematix.com>
|
||
<owl:NamedIndividual rdf:about="&fibo-sec-sec-cls;GlobalIndustryClassificationStandardsScheme"> | ||
<rdf:type rdf:resource="&fibo-fnd-arr-cls;IndustrySectorClassificationScheme"/> | ||
<rdfs:label>Global Industry Classification Standards scheme</rdfs:label> |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Has a double space between Standards and scheme
Signed-off-by: Elisa Kendall <ekendall@thematix.com>
Signed-off-by: Elisa Kendall <ekendall@thematix.com>
a) are we planning/do we want to have individuals for all the classifications? What about mappings between them? |
@rivettp - we haven't said that we would do that, just include the reference to the scheme at the moment. The classes describing industry sector classification scheme and classifier are in FND. The two included here are specific to securities. Ultimately if we decide to include the reference data, I would want to use Commons/MVF to do that. |
Description
Fixes: #1981 / SEC-119
Checklist: