Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.12] (DOC+) Node Stats fs.available reflects XFS quotas (#106085) #106129

Merged

Conversation

stefnestor
Copy link
Contributor

Backports the following commits to 8.12:

Moving elastic#103472 here.

---

👋 howdy, team!

Could we include "XFS quotas" as an example for "depending on OS or process level restrictions" for this doc's searchability for users to better understand how to investigate this potential lever's impact?

TIA!
@stefnestor stefnestor added :Data Management/Stats Statistics tracking and retrieval APIs >docs General docs changes >enhancement auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport external-contributor Pull request authored by a developer outside the Elasticsearch team Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team labels Mar 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Mar 8, 2024

Documentation preview:

@elasticsearchmachine elasticsearchmachine merged commit 9da68c0 into elastic:8.12 Mar 8, 2024
6 checks passed
@stefnestor stefnestor deleted the backport/8.12/pr-106085 branch March 8, 2024 15:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-merge-without-approval Automatically merge pull request when CI checks pass (NB doesn't wait for reviews!) backport :Data Management/Stats Statistics tracking and retrieval APIs >docs General docs changes >enhancement external-contributor Pull request authored by a developer outside the Elasticsearch team Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v8.12.3
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants