Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[DOCS] Fix ILM force merge codec param #62243

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2020
Merged

[DOCS] Fix ILM force merge codec param #62243

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 10, 2020

Conversation

jrodewig
Copy link
Contributor

@jrodewig jrodewig commented Sep 10, 2020

Fixes the index_codec parameter name. Also updates the definition and admon for clarity.

Relates to #57034

Preview

https://elasticsearch_62243.docs-preview.app.elstc.co/guide/en/elasticsearch/reference/master/ilm-forcemerge.html#ilm-forcemerge-options

@jrodewig jrodewig added >docs General docs changes :Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management v8.0.0 v7.10.0 v7.9.2 labels Sep 10, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-core-features (:Core/Features/ILM+SLM)

@elasticmachine
Copy link
Collaborator

Pinging @elastic/es-docs (>docs)

@elasticmachine elasticmachine added Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team labels Sep 10, 2020
@jrodewig jrodewig changed the title [DOCS] Fix ILM force merge code param [DOCS] Fix ILM force merge codec param Sep 10, 2020
Copy link
Member

@dakrone dakrone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
:Data Management/ILM+SLM Index and Snapshot lifecycle management >docs General docs changes Team:Data Management Meta label for data/management team Team:Docs Meta label for docs team v7.9.2 v7.10.0 v8.0.0-alpha1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants