Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Accessibility: Need more than just color for visualization validation #11540

Closed
snide opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14969
Closed

Accessibility: Need more than just color for visualization validation #11540

snide opened this issue May 1, 2017 · 0 comments · Fixed by #14969
Assignees
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Visualizations Generic visualization features (in case no more specific feature label is available) Project:Accessibility Team:Platform-Design Team Label for Kibana Design Team. Support the Analyze group of plugins.

Comments

@snide
Copy link
Contributor

snide commented May 1, 2017

image

Need some text to go along with the validation error on inputs. Right now they use color alone.

@snide snide added the Team:Platform-Design Team Label for Kibana Design Team. Support the Analyze group of plugins. label May 1, 2017
@cjcenizal cjcenizal added Project:Accessibility Feature:Visualizations Generic visualization features (in case no more specific feature label is available) labels May 17, 2017
@tbragin tbragin added the bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience label Jul 28, 2017
@timroes timroes self-assigned this Aug 23, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Fixes for quality problems that affect the customer experience Feature:Visualizations Generic visualization features (in case no more specific feature label is available) Project:Accessibility Team:Platform-Design Team Label for Kibana Design Team. Support the Analyze group of plugins.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants