You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The case being, sometimes the data relation in between each column (X-axis) is not relevant, but percentages in height makes the impact (Y-axis).
Scenario:
I have several price ranges in my data, and majority is in the 0-500 and quite a few in 500-1000 then catch all in 1000-X
Then as second aggregation I have categories, and these get visualised as splitting the bar charts (Y-axis)
Problem:
When this is displayed in charts, it is not too interesting to see in relation how many there are, as there's great charts for that. In this case I am more interested in relation of percentages. I'd lite to see some kind of tick box to ignore X-relation, and thereby have 100% height on all columns (x-axis).
Question:
Maybe this is possible, otherwise I'd like to say this is a feature request
/Marcus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
rashidkpc
changed the title
Can I make bar charts ignore X-axis relation to make Y-axis relation clearer?
Percentage bar charts
Oct 10, 2014
The case being, sometimes the data relation in between each column (X-axis) is not relevant, but percentages in height makes the impact (Y-axis).
Scenario:
I have several price ranges in my data, and majority is in the 0-500 and quite a few in 500-1000 then catch all in 1000-X
Then as second aggregation I have categories, and these get visualised as splitting the bar charts (Y-axis)
Problem:
When this is displayed in charts, it is not too interesting to see in relation how many there are, as there's great charts for that. In this case I am more interested in relation of percentages. I'd lite to see some kind of tick box to ignore X-relation, and thereby have 100% height on all columns (x-axis).
Question:
Maybe this is possible, otherwise I'd like to say this is a feature request
/Marcus
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: