Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Failing test: Chrome X-Pack UI Functional Tests.x-pack/test/functional/apps/lens/lens_reporting·ts - lens app lens reporting "before all" hook for "should not cause PDF reports to fail" #65605

Closed
kibanamachine opened this issue May 7, 2020 · 6 comments · Fixed by #71910
Assignees
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team

Comments

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor

kibanamachine commented May 7, 2020

A test failed on a tracked branch

{ Error: [invalid_alias_name_exception] Invalid alias name [.kibana], an index exists with the same name as the alias, with { index_uuid="sLzLtPsbRAWRvxVoxxkYUQ" & index=".kibana" }
    at respond (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/elasticsearch/src/lib/transport.js:349:15)
    at checkRespForFailure (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/elasticsearch/src/lib/transport.js:306:7)
    at HttpConnector.<anonymous> (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/elasticsearch/src/lib/connectors/http.js:173:7)
    at IncomingMessage.wrapper (/dev/shm/workspace/kibana/node_modules/elasticsearch/node_modules/lodash/lodash.js:4929:19)
    at endReadableNT (_stream_readable.js:1145:12)
    at process._tickCallback (internal/process/next_tick.js:63:19)
  status: 400,
  displayName: 'BadRequest',
  message:
   '[invalid_alias_name_exception] Invalid alias name [.kibana], an index exists with the same name as the alias, with { index_uuid="sLzLtPsbRAWRvxVoxxkYUQ" & index=".kibana" }',
  path: '/.kibana_1',
  query: {},
  body:
   { error:
      { root_cause: [Array],
        type: 'invalid_alias_name_exception',
        reason:
         'Invalid alias name [.kibana], an index exists with the same name as the alias',
        index_uuid: 'sLzLtPsbRAWRvxVoxxkYUQ',
        index: '.kibana' },
     status: 400 },
  statusCode: 400,
  response:
   '{"error":{"root_cause":[{"type":"invalid_alias_name_exception","reason":"Invalid alias name [.kibana], an index exists with the same name as the alias","index_uuid":"sLzLtPsbRAWRvxVoxxkYUQ","index":".kibana"}],"type":"invalid_alias_name_exception","reason":"Invalid alias name [.kibana], an index exists with the same name as the alias","index_uuid":"sLzLtPsbRAWRvxVoxxkYUQ","index":".kibana"},"status":400}',
  toString: [Function],
  toJSON: [Function] }

First failure: Jenkins Build

@kibanamachine kibanamachine added the failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test label May 7, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-test-triage (failed-test)

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@spalger spalger added Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team and removed Feature:Lens labels May 21, 2020
@elasticmachine
Copy link
Contributor

Pinging @elastic/kibana-operations (Team:Operations)

@spalger spalger self-assigned this May 21, 2020
@spalger
Copy link
Contributor

spalger commented May 21, 2020

Hmm, this looks like perhaps a race condition in the esArchiver, but I wonder if there's a reason we've seen it happen twice in the lens tests and (as far as I know) we haven't seen this elsewhere. Will take a look tomorrow.

@kibanamachine
Copy link
Contributor Author

New failure: Jenkins Build

@spalger
Copy link
Contributor

spalger commented Jul 20, 2020

Should be fixed by the combination of #71910 and #72354

@spalger spalger closed this as completed Jul 20, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
failed-test A test failure on a tracked branch, potentially flaky-test Team:Operations Team label for Operations Team
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants