Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[8.15] (Doc+) SIEM + frozen tier compatibility (backport #5564) #5696

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 13, 2024

Conversation

mergify[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@mergify mergify bot commented Aug 9, 2024

👋🏽 howdy, team!

  1. Since ES Data Tiers are sequentially hardware performant, because we call out cold this appends the same rules apply to frozen (related to securitySolution:excludeColdAndFrozenTiersInAnalyzer from kibana#172162). Kindly see examples
    • kibana#139969 for linked internal examples of e.g. alert indices .alerts-security* being hosted in frozen breaking SIEM.
    • kb#39606517 where frozen indices containing future dates catch in the Rule lookback window and therefore can degrade product performance.
  2. It looks like there's a duplicate section in the SIEM and Kibana docs from security-docs#487 and kibana#103151, respectively, where the latter had additional phrasing so cross-pollinated.
    • ( Paper-trail FYI for my team: security-docs#551 later appears to confirm indicator rules don't support cold, to confirm between PR's which is latest state in (2). It does also suggest indicator match rules do not support cross cluster search, but that was purposely later removed in security-docs#3054 for v8.7 . )

Preview:

* (Doc+) Frozen tier compatibility

* feedback

Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>

* feedback p2

* Update docs/detections/detection-engine-intro.asciidoc

* feedback

---------

Co-authored-by: Nastasha Solomon <79124755+nastasha-solomon@users.noreply.github.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9d06354)
@mergify mergify bot requested a review from a team as a code owner August 9, 2024 20:38
@mergify mergify bot added the backport label Aug 9, 2024
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Aug 9, 2024

A documentation preview will be available soon.

Request a new doc build by commenting
  • Rebuild this PR: run docs-build
  • Rebuild this PR and all Elastic docs: run docs-build rebuild

run docs-build is much faster than run docs-build rebuild. A rebuild should only be needed in rare situations.

If your PR continues to fail for an unknown reason, the doc build pipeline may be broken. Elastic employees can check the pipeline status here.

@nastasha-solomon nastasha-solomon merged commit 5edea4f into 8.15 Aug 13, 2024
4 checks passed
@nastasha-solomon nastasha-solomon deleted the mergify/bp/8.15/pr-5564 branch August 13, 2024 17:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants