Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle gemini:// links #21051

Closed
michel-slm opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed

Handle gemini:// links #21051

michel-slm opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 2 comments
Labels
O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow T-Enhancement X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team

Comments

@michel-slm
Copy link

Your use case

What would you like to do?

Be able to open gemini:// links sent in Element the same way as https:// (it should trigger the appropriate handler)

Why would you like to do it?

Gemini is a protocol that sits in between Gopher and web, and is privacy focused - it seems a natural fit with the people interested in Matrix, so it will be nice to support it better

How would you like to achieve it?

Just recognize gemini:// tokens as URLs

Have you considered any alternatives?

No response

Additional context

No response

@michel-slm
Copy link
Author

Probably dupe of #15018 but I think gemini:// should be baked in, not requiring the user to customize the schemas handled.

@SimonBrandner SimonBrandner added O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team labels Feb 12, 2022
@t3chguy
Copy link
Member

t3chguy commented Feb 14, 2022

Duplicate of #15018 - what the defaults of said configuration can be should be handled as part of the work there.

@t3chguy t3chguy closed this as completed Feb 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow T-Enhancement X-Needs-Product More input needed from the Product team
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants