Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Element-R: hang during login #25779

Open
richvdh opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#3610
Open

Element-R: hang during login #25779

richvdh opened this issue Jul 12, 2023 · 5 comments · Fixed by matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#3610
Labels
A-Element-R Issues affecting the port of Element's crypto layer to Rust O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist T-Defect

Comments

@richvdh
Copy link
Member

richvdh commented Jul 12, 2023

Sometimes, when attempting to log in, you get faced with a spinner of doom:

image

I think it's something indexedDB related. From the logs:

16:00:02.449 Removing indexeddb instance: matrix-js-sdk:crypto [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)
16:00:02.450 Removing IndexedDB instance matrix-js-sdk::matrix-sdk-crypto [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)
16:00:02.451 Removed indexeddb instance: matrix-js-sdk:crypto [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)
16:00:02.452 cannot yet remove IndexedDB instance matrix-js-sdk::matrix-sdk-crypto [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)
16:00:02.551 IndexedDB worker is ready [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)
16:00:02.551 Removing indexeddb instance: matrix-js-sdk:riot-web-sync [959eaaf02cce2e15d078.worker.js:5127:33](https://pr10080--matrix-react-sdk.netlify.app/959eaaf02cce2e15d078.worker.js)
16:00:02.552 Removed indexeddb instance: matrix-js-sdk:riot-web-sync [959eaaf02cce2e15d078.worker.js:5127:33](https://pr10080--matrix-react-sdk.netlify.app/959eaaf02cce2e15d078.worker.js)
16:00:02.553 Deleted indexeddb data. [rageshake.ts:74:27](webpack:///src/rageshake/rageshake.ts)


note cannot yet remove IndexedDB instance in particular.

It's fine after a reload.

@richvdh richvdh added T-Defect S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow A-Element-R Issues affecting the port of Element's crypto layer to Rust labels Jul 12, 2023
@richvdh richvdh self-assigned this Jul 19, 2023
@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Oct 4, 2023

This is back

@richvdh richvdh reopened this Oct 4, 2023
@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Oct 5, 2023

There is a test that is supposed to catch this (MatrixClient.clearStores > should clear the indexeddbs in matrix-js-sdk/spec/integ/crypto/rust-crypto.spec.ts). Once we find the leak, we should extend the test to reproduce the problem area.

@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Oct 20, 2023

I now can't reproduce this.

@richvdh richvdh closed this as completed Oct 20, 2023
@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Jun 20, 2024

We're still seeing this intermittently

@richvdh richvdh reopened this Jun 20, 2024
@richvdh
Copy link
Member Author

richvdh commented Jun 20, 2024

The root cause here is failures to clean up objects on the rust side during logout, which means we end up holding onto a connection to the IndexedDB. That means that we can't delete the IndexedDB, and when we log in again, attempts to open the IndexedDB block indefinitely.

The reason that the Rust objects aren't being cleaned up is that we're relying on javascript's FinalizationRegistry to call the rust-side destructors. As the MDN page makes clear, that mechanism is unreliable.

We could attempt to explicitly call .free on every reference to a Rust object that is ever passed to the JS layer (as we did for a specific case with matrix-org/matrix-js-sdk#3610), but that is likely to add a lot of boilerplate, and be very brittle.

A more plausible solution is to update the matrix-rust-sdk IndexeddbCryptoStore so that it doesn't maintain a connection to the Indexeddb throughout its lifetime, but rather opens a new one each time an operation is performed. Opening the Indexeddb is quick enough that this shouldn't have a significant performance impact.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-Element-R Issues affecting the port of Element's crypto layer to Rust O-Uncommon Most users are unlikely to come across this or unexpected workflow S-Minor Impairs non-critical functionality or suitable workarounds exist T-Defect
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant