Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC3840 Ignore rooms #13177

Open
4 tasks
matrixbot opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Open
4 tasks

MSC3840 Ignore rooms #13177

matrixbot opened this issue Dec 19, 2023 · 0 comments

Comments

@matrixbot
Copy link
Collaborator

matrixbot commented Dec 19, 2023

This issue has been migrated from #13177.


NOT READY FOR REVIEW

The MSC doesn't want servers to ignore rooms anymore,
but this PR implements a room ignore feature for MSC3840 that
works in the same way as the existing user ignores.

This isn't complete my Python is pretty terrible but I need help to continue anyways.
I also don't really know what i'm doing with the storage deltas but whatever, it's almost a copy of the user ignore one.

Pull Request Checklist

  • Pull request is based on the develop branch
  • Pull request includes a changelog file. The entry should:
    • Be a short description of your change which makes sense to users. "Fixed a bug that prevented receiving messages from other servers." instead of "Moved X method from EventStore to EventWorkerStore.".
    • Use markdown where necessary, mostly for code blocks.
    • End with either a period (.) or an exclamation mark (!).
    • Start with a capital letter.
    • Feel free to credit yourself, by adding a sentence "Contributed by @github_username." or "Contributed by [Your Name]." to the end of the entry.
  • Pull request includes a sign off
  • Code style is correct
    (run the linters)
@matrixbot matrixbot changed the title Dummy issue MSC3840 Ignore rooms Dec 21, 2023
@matrixbot matrixbot reopened this Dec 21, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant