-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 24
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Matrix of weights #84
Comments
Ok I have sucesfully implemented a way to check out of bounds performance of all methods
Then we can apply this function to any dataset we want a good summary on how well Model Combinations fareTest Data Since I arbitarily choose a value for cv.horrizon I need to crop the dataset for 2 too short series
Create Function to test errors
Compute "symmetric" percentage errors and scaled errors
Construct a tibble with all results
Find names of original methods
Compute summary table of accuracy measures
|
Can you show me how to solve all possible combinations of models with the cv.horrizon up to 18 #17? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
My suggestion is to create an matrix with all possible combinations of like
Then a function can create an matrix with all possible combinations e.g:
aut||---||---
---||ets||---
---||---||the
aut||ets||---
aut||---||aut
---||ets||aut
aut||ets||the
Then divide each line by sum of members
Maybe this demo demonstrates it better example from https://robjhyndman.com/hyndsight/benchmark-combination/
The only thing holding me back is my inexperience with programming, but I would replace the 1s the #Here,we also we have an unique opportunity to leverage our knowledge of the weights generated in the cross validation process and semi-automate a good choice for all series for example if weight x < y , 1 in combinations = 0.
This matrix could be used to create accuracy() function to see which is the overall better combination, an extension would be to add the matrix for weights = "equal" and weights = "insample.errors"
Maybe add a similar matrix for all Horizons so we could implement #17.
Sorry if it was confusing, and for the bad english.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: