Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

1.0.0-rc1: "Process" (class) - ambiguity #307

Open
markdoerr opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

1.0.0-rc1: "Process" (class) - ambiguity #307

markdoerr opened this issue Jun 18, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@markdoerr
Copy link

In EMMO-1.0.0-rc1: The emmo:Process class is described (and also classified as "A 'Process' is always a 'Physical', since a 'Void' does not have elements that evolves in time.".

I would argue that the "Process" itself is just a concept in our mind. It is, how we abstract (describe) and categorize the evolution of a physical object over time. "Physical" is what happens to the object (not it's abstract description). If the focus of the term should describing more the passive aspect of the changes of an object, like "aging process", "dissolving process", "melting process" then I would try to find a less ambiguous term.

Process(Description) in the meaning of describing a planned, step-wise change of a physical object, I would place in Perceptual/Grapical/Symbolic/ (similar to ProgramCode/Software).

@markdoerr
Copy link
Author

Here is an additional thought:

An additional differentiation between
Process - describing, what changes are made

and

Procedure - describing, how changes are made

would be very useful.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant