From 94e83687390ba0f3cfefc6e0f9c6b00f42dfa48e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: CuriouslyCurious <thecuriouslycurious@protonmail.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Aug 2023 00:50:04 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Add `const` to new_unchecked()

Signed-off-by: CuriouslyCurious <thecuriouslycurious@protonmail.com>
---
 src/lib.rs | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/lib.rs b/src/lib.rs
index 220af6b..c44b04b 100644
--- a/src/lib.rs
+++ b/src/lib.rs
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ impl<F: Flags> FlagSet<F> {
     /// }
     ///
     /// // Unknown and invalid bits are retained. Behavior is undefined.
-    /// let set = unsafe { FlagSet::<Flag>::new_unchecked(0b11101) };
+    /// const set: FlagSet<Flag> = unsafe { FlagSet::<Flag>::new_unchecked(0b11101) };
     /// assert_eq!(set.bits(), 0b11101);
     /// ```
     ///
@@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ impl<F: Flags> FlagSet<F> {
     /// This constructor doesn't check that the bits are valid. If you pass
     /// undefined flags, undefined behavior may result.
     #[inline]
-    pub unsafe fn new_unchecked(bits: F::Type) -> Self {
+    pub const unsafe fn new_unchecked(bits: F::Type) -> Self {
         FlagSet(bits)
     }