Dropping uvloop from the standard group
#2575
Unanswered
provinzkraut
asked this question in
Ideas
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
|
What about the issues without uvloop? #2167 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Hmm, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks for pointing it out. Soo.. It seems that one has to pick their poison so to speak? Although the contextvars issue seems to be easier to reproduce and been fixed in a later Python version. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Considering the current issues with
uvloop(#2464, MagicStack/uvloop#645) and their implications, would you consider droppinguvloopfrom thestandardgroup?That way, users who are aware of these issues can still opt to use
uvloop, but the "standard" installation will default to a safe implementation.fyi, this was first brought up in MagicStack/uvloop#645 (comment), which I discovered after also being hit with what I suspect is MagicStack/uvloop#645
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions