Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix equation terms #133

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2024
Merged

fix equation terms #133

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 28, 2024

Conversation

avallecam
Copy link
Member

in the first eq, to match with eq6 from Nishiura et al., 2009.

in the second eq, the y term was not clear to me, so we could replace it with the corresponding terms

@pratikunterwegs
Copy link
Collaborator

Thanks Andree, I'll take a look in a bit, but looks good to me initially.

Copy link
Collaborator

@pratikunterwegs pratikunterwegs left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks @avallecam - this looks like it makes sense.

For future development reference, the first equation is now in line with Nishiura et al.'s Eqn. 6 for the factor of under-ascertainment.

@pratikunterwegs pratikunterwegs merged commit fb8daa0 into main Mar 28, 2024
7 checks passed
@pratikunterwegs pratikunterwegs deleted the avallecam-eq-patch-1-1 branch March 28, 2024 09:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants