-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Where to put buying crypto with cash or using swapping site? #5
Comments
Thanks for the feedback, glad you like the project! Regarding your questions:
|
Yeah this makes sense, thanks!
Yes it is basically just plain coin swap. Okay yeah I think that makes senes!
By outside the exchange I mean like people executing transactions. Here is one sample random transaction I found on etherscan https://etherscan.io/tx/0x53293f7f78611f6e33630783b7145e64528d2b33bdb024771cb2156027d96ad0 Transaction Fee: Gas Price: Sorry I am quite newb in crypto in terms of taxation. In this case, the transaction fee should be the 0.033... Ether or the 0.000000086 Ether?
Gotcha thanks. That makes sense.
Yeah this makes sense.
I was experimenting on using this library https://cytoscape.org/ for my crypto visualization project. I thought it could be an interesting idea if an audit comes in. |
Got it, thanks for the clarification. You would only use the transaction fee in RP2: the gas price is just the cost per unit of gas (the higher it is, the higher the probability of the transaction being included in the next block).
Looks like an interesting library: I was thinking more in terms of a GUI alternative to the RP2 CLI interface (to extend the user base to non-shell users), but I'm curious to see what you come up with using this library. Thanks for the questions and feedback! |
All the questions have been answered. I added the hash/address column in feature requests wiki, which is used to keep track of ideas from users. Closing the issue. |
I added a new column (and transaction constructor parameter) called unique_id to keep track of hash, as proposed in this issue (it's in the latest version of RP2): addresses are not necessary because they can be derived from hash. The unique_id can be used for hash with IntraTransaction and for exchange-specific unique_id in In/OutTransaction. |
First of all, great project! This seems to be exactly what I need. I would like to contribute as well.
I have a few questions/suggestions:
Sorry for the long questions. Awesome project again!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: