Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Is :CALLF [Addr16DW] wrong? #3

Open
thomas-haller opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Is :CALLF [Addr16DW] wrong? #3

thomas-haller opened this issue Jan 13, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@thomas-haller
Copy link

As far as I can read the isa description of the STM8 in the .sinc file the two instructions ":CALLF Addr24" and ":CALLF [Addr16DW]" are defined in a very similar way. But doesn't the ":CALLF [Addr16DW]" need one dereferencing?

I do not have code here which uses this instruction so I cannot check.
@esaulenka
Copy link
Owner

Yes, you are right, this 15d9f2e code looks better.

But I dont have such code too. Needs to write some example to check it. I will try to patch some binary for test.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@thomas-haller @esaulenka