-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 41
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
docs: Explain the transitive dependency case for no-extraneous-* #347
Conversation
no-extraneous-require will fail when a require is requiring a consistently available package that is not explicitly listed as a direct dependency. This doc change explains why.
Update import doc to match require doc.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This looks so much better! Thank you for the PR 😍
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Good <2230835+scagood@users.noreply.github.com>
… available in production installations
0c4df40
to
be49f88
Compare
Your edits make it read much better! I copied your suggestion to the |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Awesome, thank you!
I bumped into this today and the rule totally makes sense, but I think the docs are missing a slightly pedantic yet still important scenario regarding importing transitive dependencies.