Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 7, 2023. It is now read-only.

Proposal to mark etcd-io/maintainers as public archive #19

Open
jmhbnz opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 8 comments
Open

Proposal to mark etcd-io/maintainers as public archive #19

jmhbnz opened this issue Sep 21, 2023 · 8 comments

Comments

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member

jmhbnz commented Sep 21, 2023

Sub issue under etcd-io/etcd#16367.

This etcd sub-project has been inactive for a significant period, with the last meaningful activity occurring in 2019. Given the repository is no longer used, I propose marking this repository as a public archive.

Reasoning:

  1. Inactivity: The repository was created as a meta / management repository for the etcd project however stopped being used in 2019.

  2. Clarity: Marking the repository as a public archive would provide clarity to anyone that stumbles across it and would ensure no time is wasted creating issues here.

  3. Resource Allocation: Keeping inactive repositories in the active organization may create confusion and require unnecessary resource allocation responding to issues etc.

Next steps

I kindly request @etcd-io/maintainers-etcd review the proposal and please provide feedback.

@serathius
Copy link
Member

LGTM

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Sep 22, 2023

+1 LGTM

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member Author

jmhbnz commented Sep 26, 2023

Thanks for the input team. I'm hopeful we can have a majority decision from @etcd-io/maintainers-etcd.

In the event we don't get a majority I propose we invoke lazy consensus as outlined in our Governance doc here:

the issue will be resolved by a supermajority of the maintainers with a fallback on lazy consensus after three business weeks inactive voting period and as long as two maintainers are on board.

Based on three weeks from issue creation that would be 13th October to be able to proceed with the archival.

@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Sep 26, 2023

cc @mitake @spzala @ptabor @wenjiaswe

@wenjiaswe
Copy link

lgtm

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member Author

jmhbnz commented Oct 7, 2023

Checking in on this issue we now have 3/6 etcd-io/etcd maintainers approving.

@spzala Can you please take a look and give this an lgtm if all good to you? That would give us maintainer majority to proceed.

@spzala
Copy link
Member

spzala commented Oct 7, 2023

+1 lgtm

@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member Author

jmhbnz commented Oct 7, 2023

@etcd-io/maintainers-etcd many thanks for your attention on this, we now have maintainer majority (4/6) voting to proceed with no votes against.

Can one of you please do the honors to update this repository to archived in github to close this off? 🙏🏻

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants