Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Default config in v3.4 is different from code #378

Closed
divanodestiny opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Default config in v3.4 is different from code #378

divanodestiny opened this issue Jun 15, 2021 · 2 comments
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed

Comments

@divanodestiny
Copy link
Contributor

website vs doc

@divanodestiny divanodestiny changed the title default config in v3.4 is different from code Default config in v3.4 is different from code Jun 15, 2021
@jmhbnz
Copy link
Member

jmhbnz commented Feb 21, 2024

Reviewing this old issue while doing triage I can confirm this is still an issue, thanks for reporting it @divanodestiny and sorry this did not get reviewed sooner, the etcd project has not had enough contributors to respond to all issues.

The current documentation for v3.4 states:

### --backend-bbolt-freelist-type
+ The freelist type that etcd backend(bboltdb) uses (array and map are supported types).
+ default: map
+ env variable: ETCD_BACKEND_BBOLT_FREELIST_TYPE

The code on release-3.4 stable branch states:

  --experimental-backend-bbolt-freelist-type 'array'
    ExperimentalBackendFreelistType specifies the type of freelist that boltdb backend uses(array and map are supported types).

etcd-io/etcd#11262 promoted the feature from experimental for release-3.5 only but somehow the documentation update changing the flag from experimental also got applied to the 3.4 docs.

This would be a quick fix to just update the flag in the v3.4 op guide to --experimental-backend-bbolt-freelist-type and update the default to array so the docs match the v3.4 code.

@jmhbnz jmhbnz added help wanted Extra attention is needed good first issue Good for newcomers labels Feb 21, 2024
@ahrtr
Copy link
Member

ahrtr commented Mar 2, 2024

Resolved in #778

@ahrtr ahrtr closed this as completed Mar 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
good first issue Good for newcomers help wanted Extra attention is needed
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants