You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the JSON at https://chainid.network/chains.json I noticed the field title exists on 6 of the networks. In that case, title seem to have the complete name of the network but name only the short version. Whereas the name field in other networks contain the full name.
This causes inconsistent network names when using chainid.network to convert chainId's to chain names:
// no title field
"name": "Ethereum Testnet Ropsten",
"name": "Ethereum Mainnet",
"name": "Ubiq Network Testnet",
...
It is possible to check if the title field exist as a workaround. Nevertheless the formatting seemed inconsistent and I was wondering if there was a specific reason behind this.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
name was just too long for most networks - this is not really a name - this is a title. So introduced title and started to shorten the name for some networks - needs more work to backfil.
Looking at the JSON at https://chainid.network/chains.json I noticed the field
title
exists on 6 of the networks. In that case,title
seem to have the complete name of the network butname
only the short version. Whereas thename
field in other networks contain the full name.This causes inconsistent network names when using chainid.network to convert chainId's to chain names:
Networks with
title
Other networks' format
It is possible to check if the
title
field exist as a workaround. Nevertheless the formatting seemed inconsistent and I was wondering if there was a specific reason behind this.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: