-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 479
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
eipw
fails to resolve requires in preamble
#46
Comments
As discussed here, it would maybe even make sense to adapt the preamble section to ERCs now that the split happened, the preamble section as defined in EIP-1 makes sense if you have a repository containing both EIPs and ERCs but doesn't make sense anymore as soon as you split |
eipw
fails to resolve requires in preamble
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. |
I also have this error in https://github.com/ethereum/ERCs/pull/92/files |
CC @SamWilsn to move this into the eipw repo |
There has been no activity on this issue for 1 week. It will be closed after 3 months of inactivity. |
This issue was closed due to inactivity. If you are still pursuing it, feel free to reopen it and respond to any feedback. |
Pull Request
No response
What happened?
I assume this is an additional problem, adding to #45
When Walidator verifies the preamble, in the
requires: 165, 721
it tries to openERCS/eip-165.md
andERCS/eip-721.md
.This should rather be
ERCs/erc-165.md
and ERCs/erc-721.md`Observed here:
46ed905
Relevant log output
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: