-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 20.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
rpc: tighter shutdown synchronization in client subscription #22597
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This fixes a rare issue where the client subscription forwarding loop would attempt send on the subscription's channel after Unsubscribe has returned, leading to a panic if the subscription channel was already closed by the user. Example: sub, _ := client.Subscribe(..., channel, ...) sub.Unsubscribe() close(channel) The race occurred because Unsubscribe called quitWithServer to tell the forwarding loop to stop sending, but did not wait for the loop to actually stop. This is fixed by adding an additional channel to track the shutdown, on which Unsubscribe now waits.
Not sure why this was there, but it's useless: when forward exits, the list is no longer referenced and doesn't need to be cleared.
The mockup server in this test can't handle the method call.
holiman
approved these changes
Mar 30, 2021
Amazing, thank you! |
atif-konasl
pushed a commit
to frozeman/pandora-execution-engine
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 15, 2021
…m#22597) This fixes a rare issue where the client subscription forwarding loop would attempt send on the subscription's channel after Unsubscribe has returned, leading to a panic if the subscription channel was already closed by the user. Example: sub, _ := client.Subscribe(..., channel, ...) sub.Unsubscribe() close(channel) The race occurred because Unsubscribe called quitWithServer to tell the forwarding loop to stop sending on sub.channel, but did not wait for the loop to actually come down. This is fixed by adding an additional channel to track the shutdown, on which Unsubscribe now waits. Fixes ethereum#22322
9 tasks
This was referenced Sep 23, 2022
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This fixes a rare issue where the client subscription forwarding loop
would attempt send on the subscription's channel after Unsubscribe has
returned, leading to a panic if the subscription channel was already
closed by the user. Example:
The race occurred because Unsubscribe called quitWithServer to tell the
forwarding loop to stop sending on sub.channel, but did not wait for the
loop to actually come down. This is fixed by adding an additional channel
to track the shutdown, on which Unsubscribe now waits.
Fixes #22322