-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 404
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support multiple metadata hash verfication #1342
Support multiple metadata hash verfication #1342
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For now just a few comments
It's reaaaaaally difficult to read all this code. Is it only me? Maybe we need to think about reorganizing the whole thing.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Parital review. I'll look more
…mpiler settings libraries converion
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM if the tests are passing.
Just, is the "libraries" part complete? That fix we can separate from this, as I said.
I shared what I discovered with Rim, he is also double checking if this way is the right way. He wasn't aware that you can pass libraries with the global scope |
@marcocastignoli meaning? What we do with this PR? |
If we can wait until Monday, let's wait. Otherwise we can just merge it by commenting the new library "extractor" and skipping the related alliance test. |
See #851
TODO