We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Thanks for the implementation of the module.
Currently read length distribution has a linear scale
Personally, I think it would be better to display the read lenghts on logarithmic scale, similar to the internal PycoQC report:
What is your opinion on this?
Originally posted by @caspargross in #1075 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Ah good spot - yes we should mimic the main PycoQC report - a log scale certainly looks more useful 👍
I guess that this was missed because the test data I have looks fine with a regular x-axis:
Sorry, something went wrong.
9b501ba
Updated in v1.10dev
No branches or pull requests
Thanks for the implementation of the module.
Currently read length distribution has a linear scale
Personally, I think it would be better to display the read lenghts on logarithmic scale, similar to the internal PycoQC report:
What is your opinion on this?
Originally posted by @caspargross in #1075 (comment)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: