Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: remove unused babel transform strict #11196

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 14, 2021

Conversation

SimenB
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB commented Mar 14, 2021

Summary

No difference in packages/*/build, so let's just remove it

Test plan

Green CI

@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #11196 (494a592) into master (4feab3e) will increase coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #11196      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   64.28%   64.29%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         308      308              
  Lines       13480    13480              
  Branches     3286     3286              
==========================================
+ Hits         8665     8667       +2     
+ Misses       4106     4105       -1     
+ Partials      709      708       -1     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
packages/expect/src/utils.ts 96.12% <0.00%> (+1.29%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 4feab3e...494a592. Read the comment docs.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 10, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants