Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: add missing module.path field to modules #10615

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 11, 2020
Merged

Conversation

SimenB
Copy link
Member

@SimenB SimenB commented Oct 10, 2020

@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ const defaultTransformOptions: InternalModuleOptions = {
supportsStaticESM: false,
};

type InitialModule = Partial<Module> &
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Partial made this missing not be a type error

@@ -83,8 +83,7 @@ const defaultTransformOptions: InternalModuleOptions = {
supportsStaticESM: false,
};

type InitialModule = Partial<Module> &
Pick<Module, 'children' | 'exports' | 'filename' | 'id' | 'loaded'>;
type InitialModule = Omit<Module, 'require' | 'parent' | 'paths'>;
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

might consider doing new Module and inspect what's on it to see what fields we should include, but meh

@SimenB SimenB merged commit 6f85827 into jestjs:master Oct 11, 2020
@SimenB SimenB deleted the module-path branch October 11, 2020 10:39
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 11, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants