fix(expect): make types better reflect reality

[SimenB]

Summary

Removes a couple of any and in theory allows custom MatcherStates at some point. This is something Jest itself should use. We have snapshot stuff in expect which is wrong - that's added by jest-circus and jest-jasmine. But we need to tell Jest there are potentially other states, so this is an attempt.

Test plan

Green CI (I added a couple more type tests)

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

Merging #11931 (1349cad) into main (02df7d3) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 93.33%.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main   #11931   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   68.74%   68.74%           
=======================================
  Files         322      322           
  Lines       16587    16587           
  Branches     4786     4787    +1     
=======================================
  Hits        11403    11403           
  Misses       5152     5152           
  Partials       32       32           

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
packages/expect/src/jestMatchersObject.ts	83.78% <90.00%> (+0.92%)	⬆️
packages/expect/src/asymmetricMatchers.ts	83.05% <100.00%> (ø)
packages/expect/src/index.ts	91.78% <100.00%> (-0.12%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 02df7d3...1349cad. Read the comment docs.

[SimenB]

CI is having issues: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/bdbzpz7qxmbx

[github-actions]

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.