Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Explicitly mention that snapshots should be reviewed #3203

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 24, 2017

Conversation

Daniel15
Copy link
Contributor

Summary

This paragraph alluded to the fact that snapshots should be reviewed (by mentioning pretty-format), but it should be explicitly mentioned.

Test plan

It's just a text modification

This paragraph alluded to the fact that snapshots should be reviewed (by mentioning pretty-format), but it should be explicitly mentioned.
@aaronabramov
Copy link
Contributor

thanks!

@aaronabramov aaronabramov merged commit fc22936 into master Mar 24, 2017
@aaronabramov aaronabramov deleted the Daniel15-patch-1 branch March 24, 2017 18:59
skovhus pushed a commit to skovhus/jest that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2017
This paragraph alluded to the fact that snapshots should be reviewed (by mentioning pretty-format), but it should be explicitly mentioned.
tushardhole pushed a commit to tushardhole/jest that referenced this pull request Aug 21, 2017
This paragraph alluded to the fact that snapshots should be reviewed (by mentioning pretty-format), but it should be explicitly mentioned.
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 13, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants