Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update docs to detail resetModules: false behavior #6641

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2018

Conversation

gluxon
Copy link
Contributor

@gluxon gluxon commented Jul 5, 2018

Summary

The documentation at the moment describes the behavior of Jest when resetModules is set to true, but leaves the default/false case unclarified. I had a misconception that the module registry would not be reset at all in the false case, where it's still reset between different test files. This misconception was clarified by SimienB in issue #6007.

The reporter of issue #4413 also had this question.

This commit updates the documentation of resetModules to explain the default case more explicitly.

The documentation at the moment describes the behavior of Jest when
`resetModules` is set to `true`, but leaves the default/false case
unclarified. I had a misconception that the module registry would not be
reset at all in the false case, where it's still reset between different
test files. This misconception was clarified by SimienB in issue jestjs#6007.

The reporter of issue jestjs#4413 also had this question.

This commit updates the documentation of `resetModules` to explain the
default case more explicitly.
@codecov-io
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #6641 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #6641   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   63.73%   63.73%           
=======================================
  Files         235      235           
  Lines        8935     8935           
  Branches        3        4    +1     
=======================================
  Hits         5695     5695           
  Misses       3239     3239           
  Partials        1        1

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 14e8bbf...61d4433. Read the comment docs.

Copy link
Member

@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice clarification, thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for your pull request and welcome to our community. We require contributors to sign our Contributor License Agreement, and we don't seem to have you on file. In order for us to review and merge your code, please sign up at https://code.facebook.com/cla. If you are contributing on behalf of someone else (eg your employer), the individual CLA may not be sufficient and your employer may need the corporate CLA signed.

If you have received this in error or have any questions, please contact us at cla@fb.com. Thanks!

@facebook-github-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for signing our Contributor License Agreement. We can now accept your code for this (and any) Facebook open source project. Thanks!

@rickhanlonii rickhanlonii merged commit a1034d6 into jestjs:master Jul 6, 2018
@rickhanlonii
Copy link
Member

Thanks @gluxon!

schalkneethling referenced this pull request in mdn/interactive-examples Jul 6, 2018
This Pull Request renovates the package group "jest monorepo".


-   [jest-environment-node](https://github.com/facebook/jest) (`devDependencies`): from `23.2.0` to `23.3.0`
-   [jest](https://github.com/facebook/jest) (`devDependencies`): from `23.2.0` to `23.3.0`

# Release Notes
<details>
<summary>facebook/jest</summary>

### [`v23.3.0`](https://github.com/facebook/jest/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md#&#8203;2330)
[Compare Source](jestjs/jest@v23.2.0...v23.3.0)
##### Features

- `[jest-cli]` Allow watch plugin to be configured ([#&#8203;6603](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6603`))
- `[jest-snapshot]` Introduce `toMatchInlineSnapshot` and `toThrowErrorMatchingInlineSnapshot` matchers ([#&#8203;6380](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6380`))
##### Fixes

- `[jest-regex-util]` Improve handling already escaped path separators on Windows ([#&#8203;6523](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6523`))
- `[jest-cli]` Fix `testNamePattern` value with interactive snapshots ([#&#8203;6579](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6579`))
- `[jest-cli]` Fix enter to interrupt watch mode ([#&#8203;6601](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6601`))
##### Chore & Maintenance

- `[website]` Switch domain to https://jestjs.io ([#&#8203;6549](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6549`))
- `[tests]` Improve stability of `yarn test` on Windows ([#&#8203;6534](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6534`))
- `[*]` Transpile object shorthand into Node 4 compatible syntax ([#&#8203;6582](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6582`))
- `[*]` Update all legacy links to jestjs.io ([#&#8203;6622](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6622`))
- `[docs]` Add docs for 23.1, 23.2, and 23.3 ([#&#8203;6623](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6623`))
- `[website]` Only test/deploy website if relevant files are changed ([#&#8203;6626](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6626`))
- `[docs]` Describe behavior of `resetModules` option when set to `false` ([#&#8203;6641](`https://github.com/facebook/jest/pull/6641`))

---


</details>




---

This PR has been generated by [Renovate Bot](https://renovatebot.com).
@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been automatically locked since there has not been any recent activity after it was closed. Please open a new issue for related bugs.
Please note this issue tracker is not a help forum. We recommend using StackOverflow or our discord channel for questions.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators May 12, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants